Posts Tagged 'urban development'

Why Cameron’s housing policy will make the UK more spatially unequal

Today’s guest post by Peter Matthews, co-author of After urban regeneration: Communities, policy and place, was written in response to David Cameron’s announced plan to demolish England’s poorest council estates.

This article, originally titled ‘ABI n* – return of the ABI’ was first published on the blog Urban policy and practice on Monday 11th January 2016.

Peter MatthewsI did my doctoral research on area-based initiatives, or ABIs. Even when I was doing the research the writing was on the wall for them.

The focus of my research had been the former Scottish Executive Community Regeneration Fund administered through Single Outcome Agreements. This ceased to be just as I was going into the field following the first SNP victory in 2007, so it ended up being about the “ending” of meaningful regenerationfor residents.

Following the 2010 election and the coalition government it looked like any form of regeneration was off the cards under the excuse of “austerity”. I’ve co-edited a book – After Urban Regeneration – that argues this very point. My research had turned to broader questions of inequality in our cities, particularly what the increasing focus on community engagement and involvement in service delivery might mean for inequalities in service delivery. Continue reading ‘Why Cameron’s housing policy will make the UK more spatially unequal’

Planning and prosperity

As the UK economy teeters on the edge of a depression, a debate has emerged on the value of economic growth as the key indicator of prosperity. Tim Jackson is the leading proponent of the argument that society needs a different metric. This argument puts particular pressures on the planning system as it seeks to shape our built and natural environment to meet our needs and desires. Since the state today has only a facilitative role in relation to urban development, we collectively depend on private market processes to deliver urban change and maintain beloved features of our environment. We need private sector-led urban development to deliver urban regeneration; we need a buoyant property market to safeguard historic buildings. The planning system struggles to meet its objectives in the absence of economic growth.

Is there no way out of this trap? Well, the planning system could decide to operate in a different way in at least some locations, probably those most subject to the flight of capital. Here it could promote community-based activities and low value land uses. It could decide that consumption-led regeneration is not the way forward. It could instead use the voluntary resources of communities to deliver environmental improvements and, most importantly, protect the results from any renewed interest by the private market. A bold form of localism for the planning system to pursue but perhaps one with genuine benefits for at least some communities.

Yvonne Rydin, author of The purpose of planning, publishing this month

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Twitter Updates


Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print.

The work on the Policy Press blog is licensed under a Creative Commons licence.

%d bloggers like this: