Social Science and the Crisis

By Bill Jordan

How have social scientists responded to the global crisis of capitalism? In his Guardian column (17 April), Aditya Chakrabortty accuses us of lamentably failing to seize the moment – a unique chance to re-assert the claims of political and social analyses against those of over-mighty market economics. He scans leading journals and conference programmes in vain for critiques of the dominant political economy of this country since the advent of Margaret Thatcher, and discovers instead a timid disciplinary parochialism.

This attack is partly justified. The imperialism of economics in the past 40 years has followed a dual strategy. On the one hand economists have reached into the domains of politics and society, and colonised them with their concepts and methods. The language of methodological individualism and rational choice has spread like a virulent rash across the collective landscape and the social sciences themselves; concepts like ‘social capital’ mark the territory where economic analysis has infiltrated social and political theory.

On the other, it has corralled politics and sociology in technical ghettoes, and set armies of researchers to work on tasks which have advanced its purposes. Career opportunities now beckon young social scientists into projects whose very nature demands uncritical acceptance of the business model of government and the managerialist version of the public services. The scope for critical thinking has been trapped within close horizons, hemmed in by towering capitalist edifices.

But the picture is not as gloomy as Chakrabortty paints it. Beneath the surface of this now-crumbling market empire, a number of important theoretical and policy debates have been raging, about the nature and role of the state, about how collective life adapts to and resists the forces of globalisation and consumerism, about solidarity, poverty and exclusion, and about the future development of societies. Above all, the research evidence on capitalism’s failure to sustain the incomes and employments of the many is available to be deployed against the current economic orthodoxy, to potentially devastating effect.

Ironically, one symptom of the increasingly tenuous dominance of the market model has been the Big Society debate. Cameron launched it as an attempt to discredit New Labour’s grandiose and mechanistic approach to public policy. But the coalition has adopted almost all of its predecessors’ repertoire – contracts, targets, nudges, league tables, incentives – and its austerity programme constantly throws up new examples of the contradictions between its actions and the kind of society it espouses. The row over the cap on charitable donations was just the latest example. Social scientists have not been slow to point out these contradictions.

The fact that no single great critique of market orthodoxy has yet emerged is scarcely surprising. Even Karl Marx took his time to produce his masterpiece. I rather agree with Chakraborty’s colleague, John Harris, who wrote that when we need another Marx all we get is a succession of Malcolm Gladwells. But somewhere, perhaps even in the British Library, a social scientist is beavering away – just watch this space…

Bill Jordan is Professor of Social Science and Social Work at the University of Plymouth. He is the author of two books with the Policy Press: Why the Third Way Failed (see special offer below) and Welfare and Well-being.

Special offer: Why the third way failed: Economics, morality and the origins of the ‘Big Society’
In the wake of the economic crash, public policy is in search of a new moral compass. This book explains why the Third Way’s combination of market-friendly and abstract, value-led principles failed, and shows what is needed for an adequate replacement as a political and moral project. For this month only, Why the Third Way Failed is available to order from our website for only £15.00 (RRP £22.99). You can order your copy here.

4 Responses to “Social Science and the Crisis”


  1. 1 Professor Alan Prout May 2, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    My suggestion is that all social scientists read Steve Keen’s book “Debunking Economics” (the 2nd Edition is best). According to Keen (and written well before the crisis),the problem was not “over-mighty market economics” (although economics is indeed over-mighty) but woefully WRONG economics. His critique is trenchant and extremely well-informed – unlike much of the, can we say “over-ideological”?, responses from non-economist social scientists.

  2. 2 ian mcintosh May 10, 2012 at 2:12 pm

    Keen’s book is a must-read. I would also strongly recommend ‘The Human Economy’ by Hart et al. [eds] and ‘The Invisible Handcuffs: how market tyranny stifles the economy by stunting workers’ by Michael Perelman.

  3. 3 Jual Bioactiva October 14, 2013 at 8:08 am

    In my opinion, the developed world has been put on the issues surrounding issues of democracy, human rights, gender equality and the like to develop their capitalism in developing countries. Mr. Francis Fukuyama has described it clearly. Then, if this means they will continue to use? I guess, yes. Capitalism always demanding fresh blood to kelangsuangan life. And it is a natural resource owned by developing countries ..

  4. 4 Obat Herbal October 30, 2013 at 4:05 am

    In developing countries, including my country Indonesia, people’s behavior is still thick with the feel of “mutual assistance”, with mutual care about is still strong.
    Could slightly inhibit the adverse effects of capitalism that is unstoppable because of the demands of a variety of natural resources.
    Modeling ideal society exists only in novels or history dinovelkan, right?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Twitter Updates

Archives


Points: The Blog of the Alcohol and Drugs History Society

short and insightful writing about a long and complex history

Urban policy and practice

Publishing with a purpose

TessaCoombes

Policy & Politics blog with a focus on place

Blog

Publishing with a purpose

Public Administration Review

Public Administration Review is a professional journal dedicated to advancing theory and practice in public administration.

EUROPP

European Politics and Policy

Urban Studies Journal

Publishing with a purpose

INLOGOV Blog

Official Blog of the Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY

The official blog of the Journal of Public Policy

Social Europe Journal

debating progressive politics in Europe and beyond

OUPblog » Current Affairs

Publishing with a purpose

PolicyBristol Hub

Publishing with a purpose

Alex Marsh Online

Publishing with a purpose

Democratic Audit UK

Publishing with a purpose

Path to the Possible

Democracy toward the Horizon

finding development

The views depicted here are my own, do not represent the views of anyone/anything else, and cannot be reproduced in whole or in part without my express written consent.

The Policy Press Blog

Publishing with a purpose

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,960 other followers

%d bloggers like this: